Case Study: Awareness of Copyright Towards Digital Content

Background:

In July 2015, Hazlin Ibrahim Khan at UiTM Puncak Perdana conducted a study to examine the level of information about PTAR library users regarding copyright laws that oversee digital content. An increase matched the increased utilization of digital platforms by educational libraries in copyright problems in the education sector, and hence, this study was conducted at that time.


What are the Issues?

Studies uncovered a burning problem: despite increased availability of electronic material to students and teachers, most individuals were unaware of the copyright policy. Individuals have the false impression that online material falls in the public domain and could be used, or that educational use is per se "fair use." Misconceptions regarding copyright laws resulted in practices such as plagiarism, copying entire articles without attribution, and sending downloaded e-materials to non-users, both of which might infringe copyright.


Legal Action & Outcome:

A 2015 report found no record of individual suits or disciplinary action on campus, but it did reference the increasing risk of legal sanctions. Copyright violation, either willfully or knowingly, can have severe ramifications for institutions and individuals. Proactive measures within education and policy enforcement are needed to ward off potential future legal issues.


Why does this Case Matter?

This scenario remains relevant nearly a decade after it initially occurred. Those students who were given policy guidance, promotional learning, and copyright education were found to be much more likely to have overwhelmingly online learning environments; these courses are more essential than ever before.

Maintaining content integrity is not just about not being punished; it's also about promoting creativity and backing up the creators of original content. A 2015 case study has proved to be still relevant, which refers to the necessity of raising awareness early and encouraging healthy digital behavior.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Case Study: Sony Music Malaysia vs. Pesona Cipta Sdn Bhd (2000)

Case Study Background: In this landmark case, Sony Music Entertainment Malaysia filed a lawsuit against Pesona Cipta Sdn Bhd, a local production company, for unauthorized reproduction and distribution of Sony’s copyrighted music content. What Happened? Pesona Cipta was found to have duplicated and sold several audio CDs containing songs that were originally produced and owned by Sony Music without obtaining proper licenses or permission. These CDs were distributed to the public, resulting in profit from copyrighted content. Legal Action & Outcome: Sony Music sued under the Copyright Act 1987. The court found that Pesona Cipta violated Sony’s copyright and ordered the company to pay damages and stop distributing the copied materials. This case highlighted the seriousness of copyright infringement and the strength of copyright laws in Malaysia. Why This Case Matters This case sends a clear message that intellectual property rights must be respected, and even companies can face heavy ...
Read more

Case Study: Sara Nadzirah binti Zulkifli v Khirulanuar bin Mohamadiah (2023)

This case seems to be recent, with the rise in popularity of quick platform such as Instagram, and netizens posting without knowledge of copyright infringement. What's it about? The plaintiff named Sara Nadzirah is a social media influencer. The initial action that sparked the case was of her recording a 51-second video of herself eating durian as a "mukbang" and uploaded it to her Instagram account. The clip/video gain significant attention, as she had a following alongside platform algorithm. ​ Infringement The defendant named Khirulanuar was the reason as to why attention went to the video and Sara Nadzirah. He posted her video on his own platform without her permission, Ezydurian Services , as an opportunity to promote his brand over the plaintiff's image of being a small content creator. Legal Action Sara Nadzirah had demanded Khirulanuar to remove the video off of his brand platform, but he rejected her request. She later filed a lawsuit for copyright i...
Read more

Warner Music Malaysia Sdn Bhd v. Metro Music Sdn Bhd (2005)

Case Study: Warner Music Malaysia vs. Metro Music Sdn Bhd (2005) Date: 8th March 2005 Type: Copyright Infringement – Illegal Distribution of Music Background Warner Music Malaysia filed a case against Metro Music Sdn Bhd, a retail and wholesale business, for distributing pirated VCDs and audio CDs of copyrighted songs owned by Warner Music and its affiliated labels. What Happened? Metro Music was caught selling and wholesaling large quantities of unlicensed music recordings in local markets and through unofficial channels. The recordings were traced back to Warner's catalog, including international and domestic artists. Legal Action & Outcome Warner Music brought the action under the Copyright Act 1987, claiming substantial commercial loss and damage to reputation. The High Court found Metro Music guilty of infringement of copyright and ordered the company to pay statutory damages and legal costs. An injunction was also issued to prevent all other infringing activities. Why Thi...
Read more